essay on The Death Penalty: A Controversial Issue; Dead Man Walking

36. The Right to Life and other Essays on the Death Penalty,1967 proposal
37. 8th Amendment Argument Essay Notes, 1972
38. “The Eighth Amendment, Human Dignity, and the Death Penalty,” possibly unpublished, circa 1989
39. “The Death Penalty and the Right to Kill,” 1987 unpublished
40. Notes on Capital Punishment Worldwide, circa 1962
41-42. Notes on New Jersey History of Capital Punishment Research, 1958
43. Notes, 1971
44. Notes, 1982-1983
45. Untitled article- Hands Off Cain Magazine
46. Untitled article- submitted to NJ State Bar Journal, circa 1958
47. Untitled essay, circa 1959
48. Untitled journal article on Clemency, circa 1990
49. Untitled work- possibly a postscript (original folder titled HAB epilogue)

essay on The death penalty is not a proven deterrent to our society

Another aspect of the death penalty debate is the extent to which justice should be tempered by mercy in the case of killers. After all, abolitionists argue, is it not the duty of Christians to forgive those who trespass against them? In Biblical terms, the most responsible sources to extend mercy and forgiveness are (1) God, and (2) the victim of the injustice. In the case of murder, so far as this world is concerned, the victim is no longer here to extend mercy and forgiveness. Does the state or any other earthly party have the right or authority to intervene and show tender mercy on behalf of a murder victim? In the anthology Essays on the Death Penalty, the Reverend E.L.H. Taylor clarifies the answer this way: "Now it is quite natural and proper for a man to forgive something you do to him. Thus if somebody cheats me out of $20.00 it is quite possible and reasonable for me to say, 'Well, I forgive him, we will say no more about it.' But what would you say if somebody had done you out of $20.00 and I said, 'That's all right. I forgive him on your behalf'?"

essay on The Death Penalty is a necessity

Robert Ingram, ed., "Essays on the Death Penalty," (1963-1992) Page 122

As the start of the new school year approaches, we wanted to remind educators and students of the excellent free resources DPIC offers. Our college curriculum, , uses a case-study model to introduce students to the death penalty system and allows them to access more in-depth research on a variety of topics, such as innocence, race, and mental illness. Each case includes relevant links to outside resources, including scholarly articles. Our covers the history of the death penalty, arguments for and against capital punishment, and an introduction to the legal process. It features interactive maps with state-specific information. This award-winning curriculum is now available as an innovative for the iPad. Students doing projects or writing essays on the death penalty can visit our page for suggested research questions and sources on a variety of issues. Both of these curricula have already been used by students and teachers around the country and internationally. DPIC's website received a 5-star educational rating from (Multimedia Educational Resource for Learning and Online Teaching), a program of the California State University, in partnership with higher education institutions, professional societies, and industry.